Project HoHoHo22 - The Beginning

As is now customary in the Pie Household, it’s time for me to decorate our windows with a festive silhouette design. This year I’ve decided on a simpler design than last, mainly to keep the cutting time down to something reasonable. Last year’s design probably took 40 hours all told, and that’s a bit much. This year it’s all about the hometown, with some iconic views that most tourist will recognise.

York Minster, as seen from Minster Gates

The Shambles, as seen looking towards Stonebow

The two designs go one the two windows on the front of the house, and they’ll end up being cut and carved somewhat to make sure the important details don’t get lost between window frames. Initial cutting out of the panels is all done - next is the process of moving the designs onto the paper and cutting out the backgrounds.

People willing to tolerate Twitter can find a process thread at #HoHoHo22

Getting Back to Work

Bifurcated. That’s the best single word I can think of describing how things seem to me right now. We’re in this strange period of emergence, where things are half locked-down; half exactly as they ever were. 

My working time is now split 60:40 between remote working from home and the office. I’ve written a rota to get one engineer per day into the office for the next 6 weeks. Mini-pie is back in school 2 days a week. Next week I’m attending an actual, real, in-person, external meeting to kick off a new contract. I’ve just been to a book shop where I had to queue to get in and immediately use hand sanitiser upon entering, as directed by a staff member wearing a full plastic face shield. On my walk home, I saw crowds of people drinking beer in the sun, crammed in by the river.

So in this weird in-between phase I’ve found myself making some foundational changes to my approach to my work. There have been three broad areas of change: 

•  Task Management

•  Equipment

•  What’s on my Phone

Task Management - Bullet Journal No More

Since the start of the year, I’ve been using a physical bullet journal to track all of my tasks. Ever since I started using pen and paper, I knew that I was doing it out of sense of wanting to feel in control, but there was always a risk that the sheer amount of tasks I need to juggle would overwhelm the system. That point duly arrived in the middle of last week, when I started going over two pages, and I was losing the will to keep up with it. 

Sorry pen and paper; it was nice while it lasted.

Back to GTD

Whenever I feel overwhelmed or feel I’ve got too many tasks to keep track of, I fall back on the Getting Things Done (GTD) method. This new disjointed life I’m leading lends itself to a more systematised life management scheme than ‘write a list of all the things I need to do in a book that I carry everywhere’, and GTD’s contexts are going to be especially helpful. 

Previously, I used a bunch of Evernote hacks to create a GTD system, but Evernote’s pricing hikes pushed me off their system a couple of years ago. Luckily, an application called Notion has changed their pricing structure to be free to individual users with no limits.

Notion

Notion is difficult to describe in a few words, but for our purposes it can be thought of as something capable of creating a sort of personal website, and that website can have built in elements like databases. The really powerful feature that makes it useful for GTD is the ability to have linked databases. Conceptually, it’s like having a spreadsheet, where individual cells can also be spreadsheets. 

Barebones task table. Very much a work in progress.

Above is my Task Table, as it currently stands. This is the master task list, where all tasks are logged with as much metadata as I can throw at them. It’s roughly analogous to my longform list of tasks from my paper notebook. It’s exactly as unwieldy as that, which is why I use the Dashboard to view what is most relevant to every working day.

Heath Robinson Dashboard

Under each of the main visible headings in the main window, you can see ‘Task Table’. What that is telling you is that each of those two tables you see on the Dashboard are really like windows, peering into the master Task Table. The tables you see in the dashboard really represents a bunch of filters applied to the main table, so I can just look at what’s important.

I’ve got more work to do, especially with context filtering. I’ve made a page which shows me all the tasks tagged with ‘able to do from my phone’ on it, but I need to make a bunch more of those types of shortcuts.

Once I’ve got the full system up and running, I’ll post about setting it up.

Equipment - Mega Mobile Office

The time has come round for The Big Five Year Upgrade, and my venerable iPad Pro first gen is being put out to pasture. I’ve dropped all the pennies on a brand spanking new iPad Pro 12.9”, as well as the Magic Keyboard. This is now the one personal computer for me (home and travel edition). 

It’s not super-grammable, but there’s a snoozing kitty in the background. You’re welcome.

For the structural analysis software our company uses, I need a PC running Windows 10. Right now at home that’s done by my 15” MacBook Pro (2015) under Boot Camp, which although slightly long in the tooth, is still as capable as any desktop in our office for the work I do. The difference is that now, the laptop will be parked at home, and become effectively a small desktop. 

If I’m in the office, I have a desktop PC. If I’m remote working from home I’m using the MacBook. 

In the medium term future, there may come a time again when I need to travel and design, and under those circumstances I’ll be forced to pack up the fairly chunky MacBook and take it with me. Even in the Before Times though, these events were rare. Usually if I’m travelling for meetings, I’m rarely doing design work: I’m participating in the meeting, taking notes, making sketches. Maybe if there’s a break I’m answering a few emails, or firing off a few Slack messages. This sort of work is iPad Nirvana, and I’ve been doing it for years.

This breaks my computing life down into nice structured, discrete areas. 

1.  Work from home primary computer: MacBook Pro running Boot Camp

2.  Work from the office primary computer: Desktop PC

3.  Constant Companion computer: iPad Pro

Phone

I’ve had to do The Bad Thing

Oh nose. Work emails. Outlook. Bad Martyn.

I’ve had to relent, and put my work email on my phone. And yes, that is 31 unread emails.

One utterly ruined weekend circa 2009 has kept work emails off my personal devices for the better part of a decade, but alas, the fallout from Covid-19 has pushed even my sacred belief in work/life separation past its usual breaking point. I just receive so much email that I can no longer afford to not to keep on top of incoming messages. Those 31 unread messages came from a productive Thursday spent with focus on one task, and a Friday which ended up revolving around troubleshooting site issues and a scheduled internal meeting. The good news was that even though those 31 emails are marked unread, I was able to glance at them as they came in on either my phone or my watch. Without some sort of mobile access to email, that would just have been a millstone around my neck.

I hope this doesn’t mark a permanent shift for me to routine email access out of work hours. I am acutely aware of the need to keep work and home separate, and that’s what I tell my team. I want people who can switch off as they leave their office, or their home workspace - I believe it makes for healthier staff. I just hope I can kick the habit if and when things go back to ‘normal’.

What? It's 2020 already?

Oh no, I’m supposed to have a Yearly Theme all ready to talk about aren’t I?

Here’s the problem. Been a bit busy with the old Christmas family hosting gig I took on, so let’s try to figure it out now as we go.

Last year’s theme was definitely a ‘one and done’ theme which revolved around the Big Move. The year previous to that was my Year of Lean, which actually worked pretty well. I’ll chuck that one into my figurative box of potential themes. With that in mind let’s consider the year in review, what’s going on this coming year, and what I’d like to improve upon.

Work

Work, attitude towards work, and work-life balance can always be improved. How did I do this year?

The things that I think went well this year at work were:

• Training for our newest graduate. He’s coming on brilliantly, and the bulk of the credit for that goes to the rest of the team. My main part in helping has been in trying to give the team the time to dedicate to him.

• Work-life balance. I don’t feel like I’ve let work invade my home life to an unreasonable degree at all. I think I managed to successfully limit the work I brought home to only that which was necessary given the nature of my work. I can say I’ve probably done a 50+ hour working week just once or twice this year, usually when multiple external deadlines have fallen together.

• Keeping the plates spinning. I’ve just about managed to keep everything up in the air without significant droppage, and it has been a hectic year.

  Things I think can definitely be improved:

• People management. I’ve been an accidental manager for a few years now, but I constantly feel like I fail at getting the balance right between getting my head down and doing the same work my team members do (because that is part of my role), and keeping my head up to keep an eye on how they’re doing. It’s too easy to put the blinkers on and say “I’ve got to do my thing” and forget there are a team of people with similar or identical tasks to complete which require my input.

• Allowing time for self-development. I haven’t done a great job in keeping up with CPD this year. Sadly, it’s one of the things that’s easiest to drop when you need to already be working late to get a tender in.

• Delegation. I feel a physical, tangible reluctance to give up certain tasks to others. There is quite the list of excuses I regularly tell myself:

  • Oh, it’ll just be quicker if I do it myself

  • This way I won’t need to check the work coming back in at a potentially inconvenient time

  • I don’t want to overload my team*

  • It won’t be done exactly the way I like it

  • Most of these excuses are exactly that. Excuses.

*Ok, so this one is less of an excuse and more of a reason. I know I get the best out of my team when everyone is focussed on a single task at any given time. I do not believe that anyone performs well when multitasking. The way I try to act as a manager is to do everything I can to protect my team from the hosepipe of incoming crap from above me, allowing them the freedom and space to get on with their own work to the best of their abilities.

What this means is that I try to spin as many plates as possible, and pass them onto team members one at a time as soon as they’ve got the last task off their desk. This way the minimum number of people (ideally just me) are multitasking, and the maximum number of people (everyone except me) are focussed on exactly one task. The downside is that is that I end up spinning a lot of plates basically all of the time.

Home / Everything else

Ok, in this category let’s lump together everything else. Health, fitness, other things I want to aim to achieve or improve at, or even just try out.

Things that went well in 2019:

• Our family successfully moved house in 2019. After making some repairs to the roof, and sorting out a manhole which had been concreted over in one of the downstairs room since the 1970s we have reached a stage where we’re about 95% happy with how the house looks. Hopefully, 2020 will be a year in which we simply get to enjoy our new place.

• Cats. We doubled our cat quotient this past year, and I neither know nor care if this ends up affecting this year’s theme, but I love my 4 year old micropanther, and I love our new 5 month old tortoiseshell kitten. Cats are aces.

• Reading. I didn’t read as much as I did last year, but I read a decent amount of books, and I branched out into a little bit of non-fiction too.

• Tech. I fully broke out of my old habit of seeking out the New and the Shiny for the sake of it in 2019. My phone is now 3 and a half years old, my laptop is about 4 and a half years old, my iPad is about the same, and my Apple Watch is a few years out of date. I don’t care. They all still perform brilliantly, and they won’t be replaced until they start to show signs of letting me down.

• Music! One of the co-hosts of a rather good podcast was kind enough to spend some serious time recommending some new artists to me, after having spent a decade in the musical doldrums. I’ve since discovered that many of the artists from the playlist are exactly to my tastes; some blindingly obvious (turns out Taylor Swift is good at doing songs - who’d have thunk it?), some a little less well known (hello Alice Merton!).

Things I want to improve in 2020:

Given we moved house in 2019 and that took up a massive amount of time, energy and heartache a good deal of little things necessarily had to make room. Here are things I’d like to improve upon in the coming year.

• Fitness. I picked up a knee injury about 10 months ago, and I’ve struggled to get back running ever since. I know that what I need to do is build up the muscles around my dodgy knees with bodyweight exercises and very short runs, but I’ve lacked the time, inclination or energy. Got to do something about that.

• Sketching. I miss sketching. I used to attend classes, but it was tough to fit into my schedule. This year I’d like to try to set aside some time at home with my drawing board and just put in some hours.

• Writing. I’m very pleased with what output I managed on this website, but I’d like to produce more, even if only about a dozen people read it.

• Attention span. I think I need to spend some scheduled time away from my phone and the wider internet. I can tell this year of obsessing over the news has been harmful to my ability to concentrate, but on the plus side has proved beyond doubt that obsessing over events which you cannot control is utterly futile.

Pulling it all together

Ok, let’s consider the improvements I want to make and see if we can make any obvious connections:

• People management skills

• Delegation

• Self development (CPD)

• Fitness

• Sketching

• Writing

• Attention span

Most of these kind of fall under the banner of Self Improvement, which is a start, but it is rather generic. I wonder if Time can tie them together, because I need to make the time to actually improve myself, or dedicate to my team? Or maybe Awareness? Being aware of what I want to do to improve and being conscious enough of it to to make the effort to alter my behaviour? I’m warming to that. It’s punchy enough to stick in my brain, adaptable enough to cover the bulk of what I’m aiming for.

Let’s try it out: Year of Awareness.

Hmmm. Maybe not? How about Rebalance? After a year of being focussed on One Thing, I’m rebalancing and focussing on lots of small things? That covers everything, but refers to none of them. Is that ok? Maybe something that’s the opposite of my failings? Is there something that’s the opposite of being blinkered? Year of Heads Up? That kind of does come back to awareness. Being aware of the world around me, and not being too laser focussed on one thing but also being aware of the desire to improve myself.

You know what, I think we’re there.

2020 - the Year of Awareness.

Yearly Theme - Getting Things Done

Let’s kill two birds with one stone!

Bird one: a topic I promised myself I’d write about.

Bird two: life update slash list of excuses for not writing very much.

Stone: this year’s theme - Getting Things Done

For the past few years I’ve been a fan of the Yearly Theme, as opposed to New Year Resolutions for reasons covered in depth on the Cortex podcast. The quick version goes like this:

Resolutions are often pass/fail, for example:

• I will start running

• I will go to the gym regularly

• I will get a promotion

The minute you skip a run, or don’t wake up in time to go to the gym, you’ve failed, so you can stop trying. And people do, in droves. It’s been a meme for years in fact.

Themes are wider, and more flexible. They can be bent to your will. For me last year was the Year of Lean. I could make it mean whatever I needed, but the essential features of the Year of Lean were to lose some weight, and to reduce the amount of “stuff” in my life. It worked magnificently.

• Chucking out old jumpers I didn’t need: Year of Lean!

• Unsubscribing from email lists I never read: Year of Lean!

• Managed to get out for a run every so often: Year of Lean!

• Chose not to eat a massive burger and had a salad instead: Year of Lean!

• Breaking free from listening to multiple tech podcasts which previously fed my rabid gadget fetish: Year of Lean! (Sorry ATP guys)

This year has been at once more successful, and less successful. We are now beginning the eleventh month of the Year of Getting Things Done, and hoooo boy, the Big Thing that had to get Done has very much Been Done. It has been hard work doing so, and it has come at the expense of essentially devouring the year in one gargantuan mouthful.

That Big Thing was of course moving house.

I am very satisfied to report that Family Pie have successfully moved about 300 metres up the road to what is essentially The Dream House (also known as “the house they’ll take me out of in a box”). As you may have read, we had some bumps along the way, but that’s all in the past. We’re in, we’re happy, and we have since doubled our cat quota.

The house has a kitchen big enough for the three of us to eat in, but also a formal dining room for when we have guests. It has a decent study as far away from the front door as reasonably possible, a playroom where all Mini-Pie’s bulkier toys can live, and a guest room on the top floor. We are extremely lucky, and we know it.

But.

The other big goal of the Year of Getting Things Done was to make a sizeable dent in my path to professional qualification (Chartership) and that has essentially come to naught. Now that we’re settled in and all urgent repair and upgrade works are done on the house, I will have more time to dedicate to it, but I am a little disappointed in myself that so little was able to be done this year. Ah well, such is life.

Rather than dive straight back into the Chartership drive, what is left of this year will be dedicated to getting the house ready for Christmas. Funnily enough, I don’t usually get too excited about decorating for Christmas, but I think with a new canvas I’m a little bit over-eager to paint. That, and come up with next year’s theme. I haven’t given it a moment’s thought until ... well actually just now.

Best get on that really.

Happy Fathers’ Day

To all the dads, step-dads, foster dads, adoptive dads, dads whose children are no longer with them, estranged dads, dads who never got a chance, unrelated father figures, and every other flavour of dad.

Thanks, and happy fathers’ day.

1.1 Institution

Ok, so we’re off to a slow start. Attempting to move house has taken up a good deal of my usual writing time; weekends and evenings have been eaten by either viewing potential houses, or frantically scrubbing our house in preparation for someone else to come here and view it. I’ve stolen 45 minutes today to abscond to my favourite local pretentious cafe to try to get my thoughts in order.

Objective: Knowledge of the Institution and involvement in Institution affairs.

Where I am told that Knowledge actually constitutes Knowledge and Understanding of the subject and its application. Taking the guidance from the Mentors Handbook, the candidate should:

1. Demonstrate a knowledge of the structure and purpose of the Institution of Structural Engineers, together with an awareness of the Institution’s Code of Conduct.

2. Attend technical meetings and seminars (recommended 3 per year OR equivalent involvement in other professional Institution or relevant CPD activities)

3. List the involvement with a brief overview of all the activities and a brief commentary on two events

4. Have an appreciation of the institutions of other disciplines

Let’s see how I stack up.

Knowledge of the structure and purpose of the IStructE is an easy one. I went on a course provided by the Yorkshire Branch of the IStructE with the explicit objective of filling gaps in candidates’ knowledge that are required in the 13 Core Objectives that they may not naturally acquire in their careers.

There, I learned that the IStructE has a Dual Role (we were encouraged to shoehorn that in) as both a Learned Society and as a Qualifying Body. In plainer language the IStructE encourages and enables learning, professional development and research for the benefit of all and publishes original guidance of its own, whilst also acting as the entity which confers qualifications on Structural Engineers via its Professional Review and Examinations. It is the gatekeeper.

Anyone who reads The Structural Engineer will also be abundantly aware of the Code of Conduct, as the results of hearings are published within. In a nutshell, the Code of Conduct is the official list of rules we are bound by as professional engineers. I admit I have not read them front to back, but I suspect if I go by the watchwords of Apollo Flight Director Gene Kranz I’ll be ok. This is what he said the morning after the terrible Apollo 1 fire - these are words I think about a lot:

From this day forward, Flight Control will be known by two words: "Tough and Competent." Tough means we are forever accountable for what we do or what we fail to do. We will never again compromise our responsibilities. Every time we walk into Mission Control we will know what we stand for.

Competent means we will never take anything for granted. We will never be found short in our knowledge and in our skills. Mission Control will be perfect.

When you leave this meeting today you will go to your office and the first thing you will do there is to write "Tough and Competent" on your blackboards. It will never be erased. Each day when you enter the room these words will remind you of the price paid by Grissom, White, and Chaffee. These words are the price of admission to the ranks of Mission Control.

Gene Kranz, 30 January 1967

Ok, moving on - we now have to contend with the attendance of technical meetings and seminars (or similar approved...) at the approximate rate of 3 per year. I remember the last one I went to, it was about the restoration of Walmgate Bar in York, but I cannot even recall one before that. I need to get out there and do more. This is going to require sacrificing a little family time because more often than not the Yorkshire IStructE seminars are in Leeds and Sheffield. Leeds isn’t so tricky, but Sheffield’s a right old trek on a school night. Wondering aloud, maybe I could do webinars?

*frantic researching*

Oh this is good. Lectures at the London HQ are recorded and uploaded to the IStructE website. I can watch a bunch of these and makes notes for my portfolio. Hopefully there’ll be some that I can make some good sketches for too; I feel like doing some artwork after all this typing.

Lastly comes appreciation of the Institutions of other disciplines. I mean I’ve heard of most of them, and I assume they are broadly similar to the IStructE (but if what I’ve been told in the past is true most if not all have much lower barriers to entry). I did have a meeting with someone from the ICE whilst in my first job about becoming a member, but was immediately put off by his manner. I used the word “Institute” and the guy reacted by haughtily informing me that “women have Institutes, We have an Institution. In disgust, I threw all the admission forms in the bin straight after. Probably best not to mention that on the form.

Ok, I reckon I’ve got the bones of a final IPD form here. I’ll get to drafting that while writing another ramble about section 1.2, Communication.

IPD forms, according to the IStructE

Given that my personal writing style leans toward the ... er... informal, I’m turning to the advice of the very people who will judge my forms to get some general advice on how to put together the IPD forms via the IStructE Mentor Handbook. Some of the advice is stylistic, but much of it is advice on appropriate content. I suppose I’ll have make an effort to no longer lean on imaginary conversations with myself as a framing device and also my proclivity for parenthetical asides for the time being. Ah well.

There are three sections on general advice for IPD forms in the Mentor Handbook - let’s go through them.

Make it personal

This one is perfectly straightforward. The examiners are not in the least interested in what my company has done, they are interested in what I myself have done. I don’t think I’ll have a tendency to waffle about the achievements of my company, but I’ll have to be careful not to let myself colour the prose too much with ‘fabricator this’ and ‘fabricator that’. That’s what this site is for, not my IPD forms.

Make it positive

The advice given here is split into two threads in the Mentor’s handbook. The first is to not concentrate on weakness, but strength. Again, I don’t think I’ll be struggling with this and to me at least it seems obvious: I’m meant to be selling myself.

The second thread is more about precision with language, and as the designated Office Writing Pedant I think I’m actually particularly well suited to keeping my prose relevant and accurate. The examples given are twofold. First, remember to use the language of the requirements: if a section is written to demonstrate ability I must use words like able and ability when describing my ... abilities. Secondly, it advises against qualifiers and weasel words, like ‘somewhat experienced’ or ‘limited knowledge’. This is one of those things that sets me off anyway: to give you a window into my personality, I had to really strain not to send a specification back to a 3rd party for using the term ‘fairly unique’ with red pen in the margins.

(Not that I’m in any way perfect - I expect that I make every grammatical mistake that I decry at least once a day)

State how you have achieved the required standards

This is explicit instruction to get to the point and not waffle. Candidates have in the past been caught out by describing the standard they must achieve rather than laying out the reasons that show that they actually meet the required standard. I do like to prattle and chat, so I will have to make a concerted effort to keep myself on track and to explicitly blow my own trumpet rather than talk around the problem.

Enough writing about writing

This is my first day on my schedule for getting these forms done, and I write to you from a short respite in getting my house ready for a viewing. This post is somewhere around 25% procrastination, 25% preparation, 25% getting myself into the habit of writing quickly, and 25% getting into the habit of writing when I can squeeze it in. Gotta form those good habits folks; it’s going to be a rough 20 weeks.

Let’s smash this. Next job, first draft for form 1.1 - Institution (Required standard K - Knowledge).

The Second Major Theme: Getting Chartered

Right back in my early days of writing here I wrote a post called “Aims, topics, and breaking your own rules”. One of the topics I said I would cover was my route to professional qualification. I reckon it’s time we took a break from responsibilities in connection design and introduced another theme.

Context: The year of Getting Things Done

I use Yearly Themes rather than New Year’s Resolutions. Last year I had a successful Year of Lean where I made a real effort to:

• Streamline my commitments (I gave up being a School Governor amongst other things).

• Streamline my waistline (I took up running).

• Streamline the amount of stuff I need, keep or use.

This year’s theme will use the time and discipline I’ve gained from last year and allow me to Get Things Done, and one of those Things I want to Get Done is to make a significant step forward in my route to becoming a Chartered Engineer.

You mean you aren’t Chartered yet? What have you been doing with yourself? You’ve told me you’ve been doing this for ten years you lazy monkey!

I don’t want to lay this out as “Martyn’s excuses for not doing his homework” however I do feel strongly that the deck is stacked against engineers working exclusively in fabrication who started their careers around the financial crash of 2007. To paraphrase an old friend from school “I prefer the team reasons or explanation of events to excuses”. Let’s explain those … events.

Lack of Mentorship

When I was a graduate at a fabricator in 2006/7, things were actually peachy. There were multiple Chartered Engineers of regard within our organisation and we had a solid graduate training plan. The business itself was created by engineers, and run by engineers. Come the crash however, the first thing to go was training. No longer could Wednesday afternoons be spent in the meeting room doing CPD, as every man was straining to keep the business afloat. As it happened, I left that business some months before it failed, and subsequently after a year of working for a small consultancy found myself back with my old team leader - let’s call him Chris, because ... that’s his name - at another fabricator (where I’ve been for 8 years now).

This time around, we were it. Chris and I were the entire design department. The business we entered had previously done no more than 1 Design & Build project per year up to this point, and we were to take that up to 5 or 6 per year between the pair of us with immediate effect. It would be unfair to suggest that we somehow resented this new independence, in fact we both thrived on it, but the lack of available mentors was tough. Who would sign off our quarterly reports? Nobody that we knew, and would we even have time to do them given that we had a voracious fab shop to feed? As it turns out, this was a good time for rapid on-the-job learning that would serve us both well, gaining bags of practical commercial experience and cranking out calculations to keep the fab shop fed, but it was not a great time for Chartership progress.

To cut a long story short, moving into a business that isn’t run by engineers or have established senior engineers in place isn’t a great place to be for professional mentoring. Don’t get me wrong - it was superb for many other reasons, and given the same choices again, I’d still be exactly where I am now. Over those 8 years, I suppose I have become one of those experienced engineers we didn’t have when I started, and I hope that my legacy in the company will be of finding new talent to replace myself, and putting in the systems to allow that to keep on happening. Time will tell.

Specialism

There is a good deal to be said for specialism, especially from my personal experience. It’s brought me to where I am and I am grateful. It has not exactly been an especially useful route to Chartership though, it must be said. I have spent an entire career minus one year working in businesses where the only material I am required to design is steel. The year I did spend in consultancy I hoped would gave me an opportunity to spread my wings a little. It would however turn out that the forces of business decreed that my previous experience in fabrication meant that I was given all the steelwork gigs that came in that year, and opportunities to master the other common construction materials were limited. If I’d stuck it out, maybe things would have evened out over time. I will never know.

Could I have recognised a lack of professional progress in fabrication and changed jobs to further my development? In theory I could have, but in practice not so much. I had already taken a large pay cut to move into consulting for that one year (owing mostly to my specialism), but then came the family. I primarily moved back to fabrication for the money, as I now had a tiny mouth to feed and would likely need to move house. I could make the years I’d spent previously in fabrication count for me rather than against. The timing was fortuitous - I hadn’t planned to move out of consulting, but it was Chris that came knocking just as my wife was 9 months pregnant with our son. Back to specialism I went.

So fast forward 8 years and now I have reached an age and position where another move back to a consultancy would bring such a large pay cut as to be effectively financial ruinous. I have to forge a path forward from the chair in which I sit, and I have to be the one to make it work.

So what’s the plan?

I have one route to Chartership open to me: the retrospectively collated route. I have to:

1. Complete 13 Core Objective Final Reports.

2. Compile two hard copy portfolios of my work, referenced to those Core Objectives.

3. Find 2 existing Chartered Members who will sign my application form, having seen my work and agreeing that I have reached the required standard for Professional Review.

4. Find a Fellow of the IstructE to do the same. Note: my first attempt at contacting a previous lecturer resulted in flat refusal to even consider such a thing. This step truly worries me, owing to my relative insulation from the wider profession.

5. Attend and pass an interview which is designed to find the gaps in my knowledge of which my specialism creates many. In phase two of the Year of Getting Things Done I must do something about these gaps.

6. Pass the final written exam. Strangely, this step is the one which many of my peers felt would be the toughest. Perhaps unwisely, I believe that if I can get to the test, I’ll be very much ready for it.

Yikes. Probably best to break this down into more manageable chunks.

Agreed. Right now I think there are two broad areas I should be focusing on:

1. Getting the 13 final reports written, and my portfolio put together. This will satisfy my first two goals and identity any areas that require consolidation.

2. Making some connections in the wider engineering community, via this website, social media, and attending more IStructE events to give me a fighting chance of not being stumped by requiring signatures from Chartered Members and a Fellow who don’t know me well.

I’m hoping that making connections can mostly look after itself without dedicating too much specific time to. That leaves the IPD forms and the portfolio.

If I want to be ready to submit by the beginning of September, that leaves seven-ish months. In round terms, that’s 28 weeks to complete 13 forms and create a portfolio. One a fortnight would be cutting it too fine, so that means I need to try to plan which reports I will have no more than a week to get done, and which I can or should take more time over. I’d like to have the reports written by week 20, giving me something like 2 months to finalise the portfolio and garner some signatures.

I think the best way to stay accountable here is to draw up the plan, and post my draft reports here as I do them.

It is time for the excuses to end, and time to Get Things Done.

Pleasant Interlude Number 2: Linea Sketch 2.5

Turns out I’m a fickle beast.

I spend 1000 or so words singing the praises of Procreate after their update last year, and here I am now re-enraptured by Linea Sketch by iconfactory.

The main reason I went looking for other sketching apps after spending lots of time with Linea Sketch 2.0 was the lack of a fill tool. The primary reason I’m now back on the Linea bandwagon is the introduction of … a fill tool! But there’s way more to this update for engineering sketching than just a simple fill tool, so let’s take a look at the shiny new features.

ZipShapes

As an engineer drawing a large amount of steel detail sketches, I often find myself drawing a good deal of things that look like variation of this:

And now I have a tool that helps me do this much more quickly than before: ZipShapes. Rather than me blather on, let’s attempt some video content...

Before version 2.5 this would have taken me a couple of minutes to do to my satisfaction. The version in the video took 18 seconds.

As well as squares and rectangles, Linea 2.5 recognises circles, ellipses, triangles, and finally irregular polygons; the latter being what it falls back on when it cannot reconcile your doodling to a regular polygon.

Combined with a select tool which can filter by layer you’ve got a very simple to use but very powerful method of creating a good looking line drawing.

Fill Tool

This fill tool though, oh this fill tool. What I love about iconfactory is the way they put in so much thought into their very few tools. It’s like going to a new cafe or restaurant and noticing with pleasure that the menu is small. You know that care has been taken to ensure that although your options are somewhat limited, whatever you do have will be excellent.

The fill tool has two modes: tap to fill, and freehand. The freehand method is, as far as I can tell, broadly same as that in Paper by 53 (another great sketching app, but more free-hand and watercolour based). You select a colour, whether or not you desire transparency, then you draw a shape. The resulting shape is converted to a block of colour with no outline.

Tap to fill is where the real action is at though. The way icon factory have configured it is just genius. It works like the old paint bucket tool in MS Paint, but cleverly with your layers and even guidelines. The fill tool essentially reacts to whatever is on the screen, and ignores whatever is turned off. The fill is made on the currently selected layer, regardless of which layer the detected boundaries are on.

I love this thing.

My usual workflow is to do everything first in blue pencil on my bottom layer with the small 4x4 guidelines switched on, then when I’m happy I ink over that on the topmost layer. When the inks are finished, I use the middle three layers for colours, centrelines and labels. All I need to do to throw in my colours is turn off my pencil layer, centrelines and the guidelines to show just my final ink outlines, select my colours and tap away. Super fast, super obvious, and incredibly helpful.

Ever since seeing Glen Cooper’s (@AvatarEngineers on twitter) vibrant hand calcs done on an iPad 4 or 5 years ago, I’ve endeavoured to get some colour into my sketches because it just brings them out beautifully. The issue has always been time - colour used to take time away from the calcs, and was only something I could afford to do when it was really necessary; now it’s such a quick job it’s crazy not to colour my sketches.

Blending and Versioning

I’m just throwing in a mention for these two new features for completeness, as I’ve not had any real interaction with them. Blending is something I almost certainly will not be using in my day job, but I expect the support for reverting drawings to a previous state will be very useful in the future.

In Conclusion

Linea Sketch 2.5 is all sorts of my jam. If you are an engineer doing hand calcs on your iPad, you ought to be using this. It’s just the best.

Boring myself: or let’s make this snappier.

You know what? Over the last few weeks I have written 1500 words about pinned connections and did a boatload of sketches to go with them, but every time I came back to do an edit pass I was bored. I’m not trying to write a dry textbook; I’m trying to write about my industry with enthusiasm and, one would hope, a little insight.

I reckon it’s time to kill this particular darling and just pull out the few interesting bits that were peppered in with the dross. Starting today I’m going to try to bash out a short little snippet every day or so to get this thing back rolling again.

Let’s do this. 

Paperless Working Part 1 - GoodNotes

If you were to take a look at my iPad when I’m working I can safely estimate a 90% chance you’d see it running GoodNotes. Everything I would have previously done on paper, is now done on my iPad Pro 12.9” via GoodNotes with the Apple Pencil.

• Hand calculations: GoodNotes
• Marking up drawings: GoodNotes
• Any sort of document that requires my signature: GoodNotes
• To-do list: GoodNotes
• Specification documents needing to be reviewed: GoodNotes

Note: clicking on an image in the gallery moves to the next image.

And the list goes on. 

GoodNotes is at its core a vector based PDF markup tool with a small but near perfect box of tools. The most notable feature is the very best digital handwriting inking engine I’ve seen on iOS - and I have tried a lot of handwriting apps. The talented people who made and maintain GoodNotes market it heavily to students as a note-taking tool, and with good reason - it is truly wonderful for note-taking. The great news for engineers is that the features included and the design decisions made for GoodNotes make it an incredible paper replacement for the practicing structural engineer.

Before we talk about why GoodNotes is great for engineers, let’s cover the basics: Any handwriting app worthy of notice should feel great to write on, and produce handwriting that is unmistakably that of the writer. GoodNotes does this splendidly. The act of writing feels natural, and the results, at least to my eye, are perfect. Also notable: the palm rejection with the Apple Pencil is great.

The pen tool can be switched from a fountain pen feel to a ball-point pen feel, and there are 15 preset colours to choose from. You have the option of expanding your default palette from a grid of 150-odd more, or the freedom to feed it hex codes for any colour you wish. There are 4 preset stroke widths to pick with, but they can also be adjusted with a custom slider. I’ve tweaked my stroke widths slightly and added two shades of green to my palette, but otherwise tend to stick to the defaults. My go-to colours in the fountain pen are the default deep blue, and a teal that I took from the expanded colour picker.

The highlighter tool has the same colour and stroke width customisability, and the transparency allows you to layer colours up too, should that take your fancy.

Aside from the excellent pen, there are tonnes of features that make GoodNotes ideal for engineers. You can:

• Import PDFs as templates into the app’s library. This is where I keep a copy of our company’s calc paper. New page creation is an absolute doddle when you are working too. To create a new blank page, you simply swipe past your final page and GoodNotes will insert a new page using the template you’re currently working on.
• Import PDFs as standalone documents (from Dropbox or similar), or import them as new pages in an existing document. Want to import a set of architect’s drawings? No problem - you can decide either to import them as individual files (which you can view in separate tabs), or you can import them a single batch so each drawing is in one multi-page document with each drawing on a separate page.
• Draw straight lines and a few basic shapes with either the pen tool or the highlighter tool with a toggle. This is extremely useful for doing small sketches within your calcs, or neat dimension lines or leaders.
• Use a lasso tool to select and move or copy any marks you’ve made. This is very helpful for sketches, and little things like copying titles across calc pages as well as just making everything line up nicely after you’ve done it. The lasso can be toggled to select any or all of handwriting marks, imported images, and text boxes. This is such a useful touch - if you’ve imported a snapshot of a drawing or design model and marked it up you can still tweak your marks without also moving the import underneath. 
• Search within your notes for text including your handwritten notes. The OCR is pretty damn accurate.
• Insert images and text, rearrange your pages and all the other myriad basics you’d expect. Especially handy is support for transparent PNG files, which allows seamless import of more complex sketches done in other apps. 
• Switch the eraser tool from traditional to erase entire stroke. This is incredibly useful for correcting dense calcs. Also very handy if you want to draw some guidelines for writing, then erase them after.
• iCloud sync means that everything on my iPad is also available on my phone. I personally don’t use the phone version for creating anything, but having access to absolutely everything I’ve ever written all of the time in my pocket has saved me on a good few occasions. 

Before I wrap up, it’s only fair I mention the few things that could be improved, particularly from the point of view of an engineer. I realise my wish list is both rather selfish and not necessarily aimed at the core market of the app, but I’d like to hope that improvements that fix the issues I have highlighted below will benefit all users... So, here goes:

• Selected items cannot be scaled or rotated. This is a feature available in GoodNotes’ closest competitor, Notability, and I suspect is one the developers are actively working on. 
• Whilst realising GoodNotes is a handwriting app first and foremost, the limitations placed on sketching are sometimes a drawback. For example, the straight line detection will snap lines drawn at shallow angles to be horizontal. A ruler tool like the one included in the Apple Notes app would be wonderful. Better yet if it could at least report the angle to the horizontal and better still if the user could define an angle to set it at.
• If I’m being really cheeky, a straight up copy of Adobe Sketch’s French Curve tool would be lovely.
• GoodNotes lacks a fill tool. A good deal of my time when sketching in GoodNotes is spent oh-so-carefully trying to use a highlighter with a circular tip filling in shapes with defined square edges without going over the lines OR taking the pencil off the screen. If you do either you have to start again if you want a neat block of uniform colour.
• Bookmarks added to GoodNotes do not export back out to PDF. I believe this is also on the to-do list of the developers though.
• Really getting nitpicky now: the default action when importing multiple items is to import them all as separate documents within GoodNotes. Getting them into a single document is a manual if fairly quick and simple process, but it would be lovely if the app were to ask if you want one document or multiple at point of import.

To summarise:

For the practicing engineer GoodNotes has almost everything you need to replace paper. Since getting my iPad Pro and GoodNotes about a 2 years ago I have not used a single sheet of calc paper. I still hop out of GoodNotes to create complex sketches in either Linea Sketch or Paper by 53 depending on the style I’m going for. Both of these apps are able to export transparent PNGs to import back into GoodNotes, blending them seamlessly into your calcs.

Given that GoodNotes is primarily a note-taking app, I can absolutely forgive it for not catering to my entire fantasy wishlist of features, and declare it truly and honestly to be the number one app on my iPad, head and shoulders above everything else.

GoodNotes, I salute you.

The Steelwork Fabricator

One of my key aims writing for this site is to try to explain what makes the role of a consultant engineer different to that of one at a fabricator. To get at this we must first look at how the two types of company operate. There is a single question which allows us to get quickly to the heart of the matter: how does each type of business make their money?

The key deliverable, the thing that you pay your money to a Consultant Engineer for, is information. You pay them for expertise, and they provide you with drawings, reports, specifications, letters, statements and expert advice. This information is then turned over to other professionals who may use it to construct a building or other type of structure.

The key deliverable of a steelwork fabricator is, unsurprisingly, fabricated steel. A client approaches you with the requirement of having the structural steel frame of a building erected where it is desired, when it is desired, and your job as a fabricator is to provide this, for a price.

But from an engineer’s point of view, here is where it gets interesting.

It is interesting because a client will approach you with a set of drawings already provided by a consultant engineer showing by and large, a completed design. A small team of consultants may have worked for months, sometimes years on a scheme design, represented in, for example, 30 or 40 drawings but it is presented to us as an opportunity to do what we do best: to take those drawings and try to come up with something better as an alternative.

And let’s be honest, what that really means, is to come up with something cheaper. 
Before we go down that particular rabbit hole, it is only right that I explain a little about the two broad routes a contract in this business can go down. The typical mix of the two types of contract vary over time depending on the economy, and the types of work in the market, but it’s near enough 50/50 for the purposes of this series.

Traditional Contract

Fabricators call these “Engineered” contracts.  In a traditional contract, the Consultant Engineer retains all design responsibility apart from connection design - more on that later. Those 30 or 40 drawings I mentioned above form the basis of the contract, and the fabricator is engaged to supply the steelwork shown on those drawings to the client; fabricated, connected and erected. 

Design and Build Contract

This is the type of contract I alluded to previously - fabricators usually refer to them as “D&B” contracts. Our engineers take on board the engineer’s drawings, their loading schedules, their specification and crucially a similar set of documents from the project architect, as well as other things such as end user specifications. They then have a handful of weeks in which to:

1. Assess whether or not there are any changes that can be foreseeably made to a scheme to generate any savings significant enough to warrant doing the work in the first place.
2. Assuming a route to cost savings has been established, effectively redesign the whole building, whilst not deviating radically from what the architect expects. Our new, cheaper structure will still have to fit into the zones pre-established by the architect.
3. Price up the work, including the costs of (to name but a few items) running one or more factories, office overheads, materials, fabrication labour, profit.
4. Prepare and submit a detailed quote, giving sufficient information to give confidence to the client that we have not missed out any vital details, but hopefully vague enough to stop our design being easily copied by a rival should the client want to pass our quote around to get a better price.
5. Be prepared to chase the work, via phone calls, emails and meetings to do their best to satisfy any queries the client has, whilst making sure the quote is revised to reflect any changes brought to light since first submission.

You can see that an engineer working on winning Design and Build work at a fabricator is required to fill two major roles, and juggle a minor third one. The major roles are that of engineer and estimator. The minor is a sales role. We are typically juggling two or three of these roles at any given time, and to pull back the curtain slightly I also have a managerial role, and a somewhat accidental role as IT triage support. 

Working at a fabricator is an exercise in furious, existential plate spinning. It is however, very, very rewarding.

To finish - If you have been reading closely, you may have spotted me gloss over something that you might question thus: if it took a small team of consultants many months to design something in the first place, how then can one person replicate something similar in just a few weeks? Next topic: time, deadlines, and fitting it all in.

Aims, topics, and breaking your own rules.

I currently intend to keep my articles here within at least a recongisable orbit of structural engineering, and my relationship with it. I also intend to limit the number of articles aimed specifically at engineers to something like every third piece. When I do write technical articles, I will still do my best to make them understandable to anyone willing to take the time to read them.

To that end I will endevaour to adhere to a set of rules I try to always keep in mind whenever I write at work, be that in emails, reports, or letters. These were set out by George Orwell in his essay Politics and the English Language in 1946:

1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.

2. Never use a long word where a short one will do.

3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.

4. Never use the passive where you can use the active.

5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.

6. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.

I must confess, many professionals in the construction industry are guilty of breaking all of these rules a good deal of the time. What is accepted as a "professional" writing style is often just poor writing: it is usually flabby, overwrought, and pompous. 

I also intend to abuse the sixth rule not only with regard to my writing style, but also my content. I will definitely write about topics outside the world of structural engineering.

I do have in a mind at least a few specific topics that I would like to write about at some point, including:

- Connections

- Paperless working

- Time

- My route to professional qualification

But for now, I implore anyone reading this to go and read Orwell's essay if you haven't already. It's not very long, freely available, and eye-opening. 

Welcome

I’ve been doing the same thing, more or less, for a decade now.

When someone is kind enough to ask me what I do for a living, the range of answers I give start around the vague, innacurate, but easily digestable “I sort of design buildings”.

I’d like to take you from that sketchy description forward, to paint a picture of what I really do,

I am a Structural Engineer, but not as you probably know them, if you already have an idea of what one is.

If a person has an idea of what a Structural Engineer is, the image they would likely have in their mind would reflect a Consultant Structural Engineer; someone who works across projects in many fields. They might come to your house to advise you about a domestic extension, or do high level design of an office building, or design bridges. They would work across multiple materials; reinforced concrete, timber, steelwork, masonry or even more esoteric materials like structural glass.

Quite by accdent, I sidestepped this life in favour of specialisation.

Shortly after completing my degree I found myself working almost exclusively in structural steelwork, starting with a two-year stint at a now defunct structural steelwork fabricator in West Yorkshire specialising in Design and Build. This is where my journey into specialisation began. In the run-up to its collapse (see: Global Financial Crisis of 2007-8), I was offered a job at a small consulting practice in my home city, which I gladly took. Almost a year to the day later, a former colleage approached me to join him at another fabricator, this time in North Yorkshire, and there I have remained for the last 8 years.

The life of an engineer working for a fabricator is very different to that of a consultant, and as I write this welcome piece, I believe that difference is one of the main topics I want to explore here. It is exciting that public awareness of engineering as a whole is increasing, so I hope that I can contribute to a modest bump in the awareness of my small, and perhaps overlooked field.

The first question I must now ask myself is “does anyone care?” followed swiftly by “is this even interesting?”. The answers I give myself are “well yes, I do” and “I truly hope so” respectively. I don’t know who will be keeping score for me, but whoever they may be, I hope they are kind enough to let me down gently if I’m wrong.